Exasperated.
I just returned from a school district budget meeting where folks were invited to speak about the proposed budget plans for our Eugene school district. We are looking at a 30 million dollar shortfall next school year- so reconfiguration of schools has been suggested as one cost saving measure. As you can imagine- people are really passionate about no one shutting their precious school, or really changing anything. It was a yay for my school night, but the folks who showed up and spoke were people whose children attend the wealthiest schools in Eugene. They spoke of all the wonderful classes their kids have (one school has choir and 2 bands), their sense of community, and the importance of their identity. All the time I was just fuming at the reality of the inequality that exists in our schools in Eugene. So I did what any parent with an overly developed sense of justice would do. I wrote a letter to the superintendent. Here it is- and yes, it’s politely snarky.
______________________
Greetings Superintendent Russell;
I just returned from the meeting this evening, and wanted to represent an opinion which would not have been well received by tonight’s crowd. My children attend McCornack, and sometimes when I talk with parents of children at schools with a wealthier demographic- I find myself feeling downright indignant at the inequity that exists between schools in 4J. Why do children at some schools in the south have more music, art, electives, and project based learning opportunities than children at my neighborhood school? I think I know the answer to this question.
The reconfiguration of schools may provide wonderful opportunities for schools to offer more to students- but only if program based curriculum goes hand in hand with that reconfiguration. If everyone receives the same offerings- then we will be one step closer to being a district that truly provides educational opportunities to all. The folks in the South aren’t going to like this idea- but parents like myself look at other schools that have more music, science, and electives- and wonder why some schools, simply because they haven’t a population that requires Special Ed or ELL services- and they have an administrator who builds their curriculum to reflect the values of the demographic of that catchment area, can offer so much more to their students.
At least my kids go to McCornack- and not Chavez (technically our neighborhood school), which struggles even more than our school does- and has no music program at all. I know the board has looked at the equity issue, but it will become extremely pronounced as restructuring is discussed. It’s not a budget issue- per se, but parents of kids in schools that struggle wonder if maybe this new system- whatever it ends up being- will produce greater educational equity at last. Or maybe it will just be more of the same. Cesar Chavez and McCornack are nothing like Menlo Park schools, nor are they likely to be if 4J doesn’t take drastic measures to move toward a more just and equitable system.
I continue to hope.
Best Regards,
Kirstin Nusser
McCornack parent
__________________
I’m tired of a system where kids don’t get art and music because they go to a “poor” school. I’m tired of hearing wealthy parents moan about how their school is being constantly picked on despite being outstanding- and how merging with poorer schools would bring down their performance. I’m tired of listening to parents express entitlement, and seeing them being listened to- while Latino parents, and parents at poor schools just take what is given them and don’t dare dream of,or ask for, more for their children.
Yes- we are in a budget crisis- but we are also in an equity crisis.
I hope we can find our way out of BOTH.










